Transfusion and Apheresis Science
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 9-12, February 2003

Malpositioning of Hickman catheters, left versus right sided attempts

  • Ali Ekrem Unal

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Ankara University Medical School, Ahmet Rasim sok. 35/6, Cankaya, Ankara 06550, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +90-312-3103333/3267; fax: +90-312-3091885
  • ,
  • Sancar Bayar

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Ankara University Medical School, Ahmet Rasim sok. 35/6, Cankaya, Ankara 06550, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mutlu Arat

      Affiliations

    • Department of Hematology, Hemapheresis Unit, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara 06100, Turkey
  • ,
  • Osman İlhan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Hematology, Hemapheresis Unit, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara 06100, Turkey

Received 15 August 2002; accepted 31 August 2002.

Abstract 

Background: Central venous catheters (CVC) are frequently used for stem cell collection and recurrent therapeutic hemapheresis procedures for patients with poor peripheral venous access. There is a tendency to prefer a right sided approach for insertion of a CVC via the subclavian route. We designed a sequential randomized study to examine the issue of catheter insertion side and analyzed all the technical data on surgical skill and observed complications.

Method: Seventy-five patients who are candidates for stem cell collection and high dose chemotherapy underwent placement of Hickman catheters via the percutaneous subclavian vein (SCV) route. One experienced surgeon inserted 12F, double lumen, tunnelled, silicon based catheters in the operation room via fluoroscopic control. All of the procedure related complications, morbidity and mortality were analyzed on the basis of the side of catheter insertion.

Results: The total rate of malpositioning in this series was 14.66%. The Jugular vein was the most common malpositioning site (66.6%). We observed a statistically significant difference in malpositioning between left versus right sided attempts, at 5.55% versus 20.51%, respectively (p=0.032). The routes of malpositioning encountered for left sided attempts were the right SCV and the left internal jugular vein, the right internal jugular vein (n=5), the left SCV vein (n=2), and one left internal jugular vein. There was no significant difference between the right and left sided attempts for mechanical complications other than malpositioning (p<0.05).

Conclusion: In this study the rate of malpositioning was greater in the right sided approach (p=0.032) and the other mechanical complication rates did not differ for the two methods. Our results indicate that there is no need for hesitancy in using left sided attempts at CVC insertion.

Keywords:  Central venous catheters, Hickman, Malpositioning, Subclavian

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1473-0502(02)00094-0

doi:10.1016/S1473-0502(02)00094-0

Transfusion and Apheresis Science
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 9-12, February 2003