Comparative sensitivity of solid phase versus PEG enhancement assays for detection and identification of RBC antibodies

References 

1. Bunker ML, Thomas CL, Geyer SJ. Optimizing pretransfusion antibody detection and identification: a parallel, blinded comparison of tube PEG, solid-phase, and automated methods. Transfusion. 2001;41:621–626
2. Hawk S, Tyler R, Russell R, Smith K, Jones E, Thompson K. Comparison of manual gel technology vs tube technology (abstract). Transfusion. 2004;44:127A
3. Blackburn V, Vincent JL, Indrikovs AJ. Antibody detection and identification: gel technology versus tube method (abstract). Transfusion. 2002;42:109S
4. Issitt PD, Combs MR, Bradshaw T. Comparison of a solid phase and polyethylene glycol (PEG) IAT method in a large transfusion service (abstract). Transfusion. 1997;37:28S
5. Reilly B, DePalma H, Cosgrove P, Parsi M, Grima K. Comparison study between routine tube test (LISS), PEG tube test, gel technology and solid phase red cell adherence assays (abstract). Transfusion. 1997;37:64S
6. Carter JE, Gallego M, Stubbs JR. The identification of red cell antibodies: a comparative study of a solid phase red cell adherence system, a gel system, and agglutination testing (abstract). Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;107:486–487
7. Reisner R, Butler G, Bundy K, Moore SB. Comparison of the polyethylene glycol antiglobulin test and the use of enzymes in antibody detection and identification. Transfusion. 1996;36:487–489
8. de Castilho LM, Pellegrino J, Bechelli AP, LePennec PY, Mendes NF. Evaluation of recent techniques for detection of red blood cell antibodies in sera of reference samples, patients, pregnant women, and blood donors. J Clin Lab Anal. 1996;10:250–256
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
9. Shirey RS, Boyd JS, Ness PM. Polyethylene glycol versus low-ionic-strength solution in pretransfusion testing: a blinded comparison study. Transfusion. 1994;34:368–370
10. Wenz B, Apuzzo J, Shah DP. Evaluation of the polyethylene glycol-potentiated indirect antiglobulin test. Transfusion. 1990;30:318–321
11. Nance SJ, Garratty G. A new potentiator of red blood cell antigen-antibody reactions. Am J Clin Path. 1987;87:633–635
12. Slater JL, Griswold DJ, Wojtyniak LS, Reisling MJ. Evaluation of the polyethylene glycol-indirect antiglobulin test for routine compatibility testing. Transfusion. 1989;29:686–688
13. Rumsey DH, Sandler SG. Naturally occurring anti-Jka by solid phase method only (abstract). Transfusion. 1999;39:46S
14. Rosenfield RE, Kochwa S, Kaczera Z. Solid phase serology for the study of human erythrocytic antigen-antibody reactions. Proceedings of the 17th Congress of the International Society of Haematology. 1976;27–33
15. Plapp FV, Sinor LT, Rachel JM, Beck ML, Coenen WM, Bayer WL. A solid phase antibody screen. Am J Clin Pathol. 1984;82:719–721
    • MEDLINE
16. Rachel JM, Sinor LT, Beck ML, Plapp FV. A solid-phase antiglobulin test. Transfusion. 1985;25:24–26
17. Ostendorf N, Niefhoff D, Cassens U, Sibrowski W. Automated serological compatibility testing using a solid-phase test and standard laboratory equipment. Vox Sang. 2001;80:225–229
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
18. Craig D, Darmitzel NJ. Comparison of a walkaway automated blood bank instrument to manual methods (abstract). Transfusion. 1999;39:95S
19. Jarosz CR, Paglin A, Silberman S, Urani J. Evaluation of the ABS2000 in a tertiary care hospital (abstract). Transfusion. 2000;40:124S
20. Sandler SG, Langeberg A, Avery N, Mintz PD. A fully automated blood typing system for hospital transfusion services. Transfusion. 2000;40:201–207
21. Uthemann H, Poschmann A. Solid-phase antiglobulin test for screening and identification of red cell antibodies. Transfusion. 1990;30:114–116
22. Lapierre Y, Rigal D, Adam J, Lapierre Y, Rigal D, Adam J, et al. The gel test: a new way to detect red cell antigen-antibody reactions. Transfusion. 1990;30:109–113
23. Bielski M. Two years of new antibody identification (abstract). Transfusion. 2004;44:125A